Chapter 2 of 10·22 min left in book
Chapter 2
What the Studies Actually Show
The most useful studies do not show that GLP-1 medications “eat muscle.” They show that substantial weight loss is made up mostly of fat mass, with a smaller average reduction in measured lean mass. They also show why one percentage should never be pulled out of context.
In an exploratory DXA analysis from the STEP 1 semaglutide trial, 140 participants had body-composition measurements. After 68 weeks, average body weight in the semaglutide group was 15.0% lower, total fat mass was 19.3% lower, visceral fat was 27.4% lower, and total lean body mass was 9.7% lower. Because fat mass fell more, lean mass made up a larger proportion of the body at the end of the study.
That result does not mean each participant lost 9.7% of skeletal muscle. It describes the average change in DXA-measured lean body mass in a small exploratory subset. It also cannot tell us how much of the change was water, organ tissue, connective tissue, or muscle.
In the SURMOUNT-1 tirzepatide DXA substudy, 160 participants had evaluable scans. At 72 weeks, average body weight was 21.3% lower, fat mass was 33.9% lower, and lean mass was 10.9% lower. The researchers estimated that roughly 75% of the weight lost was fat mass and roughly 25% was lean mass.
STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-1 should be shown in separate panels. They enrolled different participants, used different drugs and designs, and were not a head-to-head test of muscle preservation. Their common lesson is more important than a drug comparison: fat loss predominated, while absolute lean mass also declined.
Two DXA substudies, read separately
- STEP 1 — semaglutide
- Exploratory subset: n=140 at 68 weeks. Average body weight −15.0%, total fat mass −19.3%, and lean body mass −9.7%.
- SURMOUNT-1 — tirzepatide
- Evaluable subset: n=160 at 72 weeks. Average body weight −21.3%, fat mass −33.9%, and lean mass −10.9%. About 75% of weight lost was fat mass and 25% lean mass.
- Interpretation
- Fat loss predominated and absolute DXA-measured lean mass also declined. These were not head-to-head studies, and lean mass is not the same as skeletal muscle.
Separate trial substudies, separate designs. Both reported larger average fat-mass reductions than lean-mass reductions.
Credit: Sources: Wilding et al., 2021; Look et al., 2025.
There is also an evidence gap. We have strong trials showing that semaglutide and tirzepatide reduce weight and fat mass. We have smaller body-composition substudies. We do not yet have a large completed trial proving one exact protein-and-resistance program prevents a specified amount of skeletal-muscle loss with these medications.
That uncertainty is not a reason to do nothing. It is a reason to use the best-supported general weight-loss principles, label the extrapolation honestly, and monitor outcomes that matter to the person.
Chapter summary
What the studies support today
- Most measured weight loss was fat mass.
- Absolute measured lean mass also declined on average.
- Direct semaglutide/tirzepatide protein-and-resistance trials remain limited.

